How APRA’s performance test fails sustainable investors | Pendal Group
Hi there! Welcome to the new look Pendal website... Take a two minute tour to see what we’ve changed.

Mainstream Online Web Portal

Investors can view their accounts online via a secure web portal. After registering, you can access your account balances, periodical statements, tax statements, transaction histories and distribution statements / details.
Advisers will also have access to view their clients’ accounts online via the secure web portal.

How APRA’s performance test fails sustainable investors

February 09, 2022

Sustainable investors may receive APRA letters informing them that their super fund has failed a performance test — even though it’s doing precisely what was intended. Pendal’s ANTHONY SERHAN explains

THE federal government’s Your Future, Your Super annual testing regime for super funds is disadvantaging investors seeking to do good with their savings by investing in sustainable or impact funds, says Pendal’s Anthony Serhan.

Sustainable investing is a fast-growing part of the superannuation industry. Responsible investing now influences strategic asset allocation for most super funds in Australia (55% up from 39% in 2019).

But the YFYS test administered by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority benchmarks super funds against pre-set, cap-weighted, broad-based indices — without regard to factors like the environmental impact of the underlying companies.

“If you’re investing in a sustainable way, you can be investing a long way from unadjusted market capitalisation weighted indexes,” says Serhan, Pendal’s distribution director.

“In Australia, an investor who wants to support net zero carbon emissions will not want to invest in anything related to fossil fuels — but that takes out a huge chunk of the market.

“Yet you’re being compared to something that does include those fossil fuels stocks, as well as other sectors of concern including tobacco, gambling and armaments.

“That’s clearly going to create noise. While it’s reduced over longer periods, the YFYS test is dealing in basis points — so if there’s a significant move at the start or end of a reporting period it will still impact the results.

Sustainable and 
Responsible Investments 

Fund Manager of the Year

“And while the eight years used in the test is a long period, some of the themes addressed in sustainable strategies are multi-decade.”

Serhan says the result is that some investors will receive letters informing them that their super fund has failed the performance test — even though it’s doing precisely what they intended it to do.

“It is highly probable sustainable super funds will fail the test at some point because they are not owning certain parst of the market.

“Is that a good policy outcome? Probably not.”

Impact on global equities

And it’s not just investors in Australian equities that are disadvantaged by APRA’s tests.

Global sustainable investors tend to be underweight developing countries that naturally have fewer large companies fitting ESG criteria.

Yet they are now compared to indexes that fully weight emerging markets and pay no regard in the allocation process to issues such as human rights and the rule of law, corporate governance standards, or environmental impact.

“What do you do about that? If you’re a sustainable manager you’re likely underweight emerging markets which creates a mismatch between the index and your portfolio — that either creates noise or you’re going to have find a way to close that gap,” says Serhan.

Potential solutions

Serhan says the solution for APRA would be to adopt more flexible frameworks to assess super funds, judging them more on performance against their stated aims rather than against a passive index approach.

The APRA tests are likely to see a convergence of portfolios around the stated benchmarks which will push some investors to self-managed super funds where there is currently greater flexibility to do good with their super savings while investing for retirement, he says.

“The market cap weighted indices are simply a reflection of what has worked in the past — they are not a reflection of where markets are going in the future and they certainly don’t reflect which companies will be the winners from the move to net zero.”

So, what should you do when you get that letter saying your fund has failed APRA’s tests?

“Take a look at the fund and make your own assessment — is this fund delivering what I wanted it to deliver?” says Serhan.

“The letter will point you to government websites or super comparators — but these are very poor forms of financial advice.

“Instead, just ask yourself and your financial planner: am I happy with the returns and what the fund is achieving in the way it invests my money?”


About Anthony Serhan and Pendal

Anthony joined Pendal as Distribution Director in 2018 after 15 years in senior leadership roles at Morningstar. Anthony is a director and past president of the CFA Society of Sydney and a member of the National Advocacy Council.

Pendal is an independent, global investment management business focused on delivering superior investment returns for our clients through active management.

Pendal is a leader in responsible investing. In 2021 we were named Zenith’s Sustainable and Responsible Investments Fund Manager of the Year. Our RI funds include:

Crispin Murray’s sustainable Aussie equities Pendal Horizon Fund

Pendal Sustainable Australian Fixed Income Fund

Regnan Global Equity Impact Solutions Fund

Contact a Pendal key account manager here


This information has been prepared by Pendal Fund Services Limited (PFSL) ABN 13 161 249 332, AFSL No 431426 and is current as at February 10, 2021. This information is for general purposes only, should not be considered as a comprehensive statement on any matter and should not be relied upon as such. It has been prepared without taking into account any recipient’s personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this, recipients should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness having regard to their individual objectives, financial situation and needs. This information is not to be regarded as a securities recommendation.

The information may contain material provided by third parties, is given in good faith and has been derived from sources believed to be accurate as at its issue date. While such material is published with necessary permission, and while all reasonable care has been taken to ensure that the information is complete and correct, to the maximum extent permitted by law neither PFSL nor any company in the Pendal group accepts any responsibility or liability for the accuracy or completeness of this information.

Performance figures are calculated in accordance with the Financial Services Council (FSC) standards. Performance data (post-fee) assumes reinvestment of distributions and is calculated using exit prices, net of management costs. Performance data (pre-fee) is calculated by adding back management costs to the post-fee performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

Any projections are predictive only and should not be relied upon when making an investment decision or recommendation. Whilst we have used every effort to ensure that the assumptions on which the projections are based are reasonable, the projections may be based on incorrect assumptions or may not take into account known or unknown risks and uncertainties. The actual results may differ materially from these projections.

For more information, please call Customer Relations on 1300 346 821 8am to 6pm (Sydney time) or visit our website www.pendalgroup.com

Keep updated
Sign up to receive the latest news and views