Prevailing view or misconception? Pendal’s Amy Xie Patrick busts a few modern investing myths

The past few years have played havoc with market assumptions. Here, Pendal’s AMY XIE PATRICK explains what’s really going on with inverted yield curves and other misunderstood investing concepts

• Bonds not a “servant asset class” to equities
• Owning bonds at this stage of the cycle could be useful
• Why bonds, why now? Pendal’s income and fixed interest experts explain
• Browse Pendal’s fixed interest funds

THE past few years have played havoc with conventional market assumptions.

Inverted yield curves don’t mean recessions are imminent. Expensive valuations can get more expensive. An aggressive hiking cycle need not bring about recession. Bonds don’t have to go up when equities go down.

These kind of outcomes cause head-scratching among modern-day market participants.

But viewed through a longer-term lens (think multiple cycles and regimes) it becomes clearer.

Let’s have a look at each of these broken relationships.

Are yield curves a recession predictor?

An inverted yield curve happens when short-term interest rates are higher than long-term ones — an unusual occurrence traditionally viewed as a sign of economic slow-down or looming recession.

In my view, inverted yield curves don’t signal imminent recession.

Yes, every US recession has been preceded by an inverted yield curve.

But if you look back through enough history, you’ll discover that the lag between the moment of curve inversion and when a recession eventually hits is highly variable (three months to two years).

As far as recession indicators go, the inverted yield curve is about as useful as a wet paper bag.

So, what does an inverted yield curve tell us? Simply that the market expects interest rate cuts at some point down the line, and that current policy settings are restrictive and will be normalised (for whatever reason) in the future.

Two things cause policy settings to normalise from restrictive territory: either growth slows, or inflation cools. It can also be both, but disinflation is possible without slower growth. 2023 was evidence of that.

Valuations are not a trading tool

Valuations should provide investors with information on risk-reward dynamics, but they have never been a good timing tool for investment decisions.

With the hype of generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) building over the past year has come plenty of scepticism over where that now puts overall equity valuations. That scepticism is probably what makes expensive tech stocks more expensive when markets are benign.

It takes a reality that falls short of expectations to make those stocks cheaper. Maybe even then, they won’t be outright cheap.

Hikes weren’t the only thing that happened

The rate hikes of 2022 and 2023 were supposed to cause a recession.

What we didn’t expect was a break from fiscal prudence and outright austerity.

The market lacked muscle memory for how to incorporate the pandemic fiscal response. Nowhere was it larger or more enduring than the United States.

The result of this stimulus, which happened in multiple forms over most of the world, was to put cash into people’s pockets.

That liquid spending power mutes the effect of interest rate hikes. Who cares if the cost of borrowing is soaring when there’s all this cash in my pocket?

That doesn’t mean those rate hikes will never matter. The effects will reveal themselves when the cash runs out.

Ironically, for the next economic cycle to begin, this current cycle needs to find a landing.

Soft or hard landing probably doesn’t matter too much – either way, interest rates will come down and borrowing can then become affordable to fuel the next wave of spending.

Bonds reveal their true colours

In the two decades after the Global Financial Crisis — and indeed because of the GFC — central banks extended a “put” to equity markets. If things got bad enough, they would cut interest rates.

Since bond yields and policy rates are inextricably linked, lower yields would lead to a boost in bond prices.

The negative correlation between bonds and equities during this period somehow made its way into tautology.

We are taught in Finance 101 that bonds are a “defensive” asset class, but what we ignored was that the only thing that afforded the “central bank put” was the absence of any real inflation impulse.

Bonds have never been a servant asset class to equities.

The same fundamentals that matter to bonds have always mattered: where inflation goes, where growth goes, and where central banks will take interest rates. That’s why bonds always rally at the start of recessions.

Whether central banks are late or right, a rapid cutting cycle will accompany any recession. The irony is that most recessions are baked in before the first rate cut.

What caused so much grief in 2022 was that higher inflation was a bigger problem than growth. Bonds did their job: yields rose and prices fell in anticipation of higher policy rates.

Since a high-inflation problem is a problem for all asset classes, bonds couldn’t help when equities derated. This time, the inflation backdrop meant that the central bank put was unaffordable.

Supportive part of the cycle for bonds

Bonds respond to the economic cycle.

As an asset class price returns tend to be mean reverting, with the forty-year bond bull run being an anomaly rather than the norm.

What matters more for bonds now isn’t whether the US fiscal situation is out of control, or whether Asian central banks have stopped buying US bonds. Political noise injects volatility bond markets, but their course will be set by the forces of the cycle.

For the next 12 months, what matters is inflation and growth, and on both fronts there’s reason to believe that bonds will be quite useful.

The path of disinflation has been bumpy and slow, but most major economy inflation data are coming within sight of central bank targets. This alone removes the need to fear more hikes and opens the door for easing.

Growth is also softening. No aspect of growth or demand is falling off a cliff, but it’s telling that oil has not been able to rally despite two unfortunate wars taking place in oil-heavy regions.

Europe has been teetering on the edge of recession for almost two years. China is going through its own version of the GFC aftermath. The bright spots have been where most fiscal ammunition was deployed during the pandemic.

The news here is that excess cash from pandemic-related fiscal stimulus is running out. A high US deficit alone won’t replenish that cash – that requires an ever-increasing higher deficit. That positive fiscal impulse is absent from current events.

The not-so-new news is that even if rate cuts were to start immediately, they are unlikely to offset the rise of average borrowing costs as older fixed-rate loans reset. This is especially true in the US.

Effects like these contribute to those long and variable lags of monetary policy.

What’s good for bond won’t always be good for equities

Given the positive correlation between bonds and equities, the market now thinks what’s good for bonds is also good for equities.

That’s true, but only up to a point.

As mentioned, lower inflation and growth are both good for bonds, but only the first of those things is good for equities.

When looking at risk premia across equities, credit and global market volatility, we can see that a soft landing is what’s priced in.

Earnings growth expectations over the next 12 months look very healthy. Trump tax cuts have already been baked into market prices even though polls have seen his chances of winning slide from 70% to now below 50% since Kamala Harris entered the race.

Exuberant sentiment can never in itself cause a market to turn, just like how valuations are poor timing tools. However, when risky assets are priced for very little downside this means that in the event of a negative catalyst, the downside becomes asymmetrically larger than any upside that can be gained from here.

At the start of every cycle’s softening trend, it’s impossible to discern whether the softening will accelerate – resulting in a hard landing.

The early part of the softening is good for bonds and equities, especially as the world comes off a high inflation problem. The risk is increasing that lower inflation will be engulfed by much lower growth.

Owning bonds at this stage of the cycle makes a lot of sense.

They will pay you a positive income and could deliver capital appreciation if inflation continues to come off – especially if that is accompanied by a worsening growth outlook.

The risk is another inflation shock, but there is sufficient consistency in lower prices and wages to argue for removing higher policy rates for the rest of this cycle.

Not owning equities can feel painful when the tech and AI driven story keeps gaining new legs.

So, owning bonds against this FOMO (fear of missing out) is a no-brainer – not because bonds are there to save us when equities fall, but because the growth speed bump that causes equities to fall is exactly the economic fundamental that will be a boon for bonds.