Despite a cloudy narrative, Pendal’s emerging markets team remains overweight in Chinese equities via a highly selective set of stocks. Here, they explain why

THERE’S been a lot of focus recently on what bond market signals are telling us about the outlook for growth.

This is true for emerging markets such as Brazil and Mexico as well – though investors have tended to overlook some dramatic moves in Chinese bonds.

The US five-year bond yield has fallen slightly this year.

Medium-term bond yields have risen in many emerging markets, amid concerns that a strong US dollar might delay interest rate cuts, or even (as is the case in Indonesia) prompt interest rate hikes.

In China, though, the five-year bond yield has fallen from 2.4% to less than 1.9%.

This has led China’s central bank (also known as the People’s Bank of China or PBoC) to worry about a bubble in Chinese government bond prices.

As a result the PBoC has been gently intervening in markets to try to prevent bond yields falling too far or too fast.

Bond yield moves look rational

Despite the central bank’s concerns, these moves in yields look rational to us.

Inflation in China is low and quite possibly negative. The latest inflation measures are +0.5% for CPI, -0.8% for PPI (both to July) and -0.7% for the GDP deflator.

Deflation increases the real yield on bonds, while real estate and equities are potentially hurt by deflation in a leveraged economy.

Find out about

Pendal Global Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund

As well as the signal from inflation, the credit environment is also signalling an ongoing deflationary economic slowdown.

July lending data shows a contraction in bank loans as corporates and households look to pay down debt.

This is the first contraction in lending in the economy since 2005, including during Covid and the GFC.

Given the historical pattern of a decade-long, debt-driven real-estate boom followed by what looks like a debt-deflationary slowdown, there is a temptation to see China falling into the same kind of balance sheet recession that Japan experienced after its late 1980s boom.

Only just this year has Japan’s Nikkei equity index exceeded its 1989 peak.

Do Chinese equities also face a similar “lost decade” as Japan did in the 1990s?

One group that might be worried are the western multinational companies that have been reporting sharp downturns in their China sales in recent quarters.

From beer to luxury products to cosmetics to cars, a clear pattern has emerged of results commentary warning about Chinese demand.

We feel a more detailed look at company results shows a different, more promising pattern.

Good results among Chinese companies

In the above consumer segments – as well as areas such as travel, tourism and e-commerce – many Chinese domestic companies are reporting good results and earnings growth.

James Syme, Paul Wimborne and Ada Chan (l-r) … fund managers for Pendal Global Emerging Markets Opportunities fund

Consensus estimates of future earnings are also being revised up.

We feel this reflects Chinese consumers pivoting to different products and lower price points, as well as a new preference for domestic Chinese brands.

For example, foreign car makers have fallen from 64% market share in China to 38% over the past four years.

A similar pattern is emerging in other products, including beer and cosmetics.

With these companies performing well, China’s broad equity market weakness in recent years (especially for Hong Kong-listed names) has pushed some stocks to attractive valuations – especially compared to falling bond yields.

Yes, China’s economy is struggling for growth.

Its credit environment is particularly difficult and there has so far been no turnaround in the wider real estate market.

Yet there are opportunities to be found in Chinese equities.

We remain overweight Chinese equities in the portfolio, with exposure to a highly selective set of stocks.

About Pendal Global Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund

James Syme, Paul Wimborne and Ada Chan are co-managers of Pendal’s Global Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund.

The fund aims to add value through a combination of country allocation and individual stock selection.

The country allocation process is based on analysis of a country’s economic growth, monetary policy, market liquidity, currency, governance/politics and equity market valuation.

The stock selection process focuses on buying quality growth stocks at attractive valuations.

Find out more about Pendal Global Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund here
 
Pendal is a global investment management business focused on delivering superior investment returns for our clients through active management.

Contact a Pendal key account manager here

Here are the main factors driving the ASX this week, according to Aussie equities analyst and portfolio manager ELISE MCKAY. Reported by portfolio specialist Chris Adams


REPORTING season has shown that the consumer is holding up better than expected – helped largely by Baby Boomers – and credit conditions have improved, benefiting the REIT sector. Capital discipline has been rewarded.

The S&P/ASX 300 gained 1.01% last week, but the US market was muted.

The S&P 500 was up 0.27%, while the NASDAQ was down 0.91% as NVIDIA’s (down 7.7%) result was not good enough for the market.

NVIDIA reported strong revenue, with data centre sales up 154% year-over-year (YoY) and ahead of expectations, signalling that AI demand is intact. However, its gross profit margin guidance disappointed, resulting in much more muted EPS upgrades. 

It was a quiet week on the macro front.

US Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) inflation data is no longer a major market mover, unlike earlier this year, as the Fed has moved its primary focus from inflation to labour.

With a September rate cut now a given in the US, the labour data released this Friday (6 September) will be key to helping determine the size. 

While the market is pricing a 50% chance of a 50-basis-point (bps) rate cut, the Atlanta Fed GDPNow Tracker is forecasting a robust 2.5% real Gross Domestic Product growth for Q324 – suggesting that we are still on track for a soft landing. 

US policy and macro

PCE data

July’s PCE inflation was in line with expectations on both a headline (up 0.2% month-on-month (MoM) and 2.5% YoY) and core (up 0.16% MoM and 2.6% YoY) basis.

This is the third consecutive month where we have seen the MoM number come in below the Fed’s forecast. As a result, we expect that the Fed committee will need to revise down its Q2 2024 inflation forecast at next month’s meeting, which is currently sitting at 2.6%. 

There was nothing in this print to upend the view that the Fed has moved from being inflation-first to labour market-first. 

The market’s question now is whether the Fed cuts by 25bps or 50bps in September. This Friday’s labour data will be key in this regard.

PCE Core goods inflation is back in deflationary territory, with a MoM print down -0.1%. 

The Fed’s preferred metric, Core services (excluding housing), increased from 0.16% last month to 0.21% MoM. But the trend is in the right direction, with the three-month annualised rate now at +2% YoY. 

Personal consumption

Consumption growth has maintained decent momentum – with real consumption spending coming in at 0.4% MoM (versus consensus at 0.3%), driven primarily by goods expenditure (up 0.7% MoM). 

Spending on autos picked up meaningfully to 4.1% MoM, but even stripping this out, goods expenditure still grew a robust 0.4% MoM.

Consumption appears to have accelerated from the 2.9% annualised rate in Q2. This is at odds with income growth, which is on the weaker side. 

Personal incomes grew 0.3% MoM in July and real after-tax income rose by just 0.1% MoM, with the annualised number only just over 1%. 

With consumption running roughly 2% above income growth, consumers are saving less in order to fund their lifestyles. The savings rate dropped to 2.9% in July – the second lowest rate since 2008 and well below the pre-Covid average of about 6%. 

It is reasonable to assume that, should the labour market continue to soften, we should see people start to save more in precaution, thus dampening consumption growth. However, this is yet to be seen in practice.

US pending homes sales

The strength in consumer spending has not made its way into a stronger housing market. Pending home sales fell 5.5% in July, versus expectations of 0.2% growth. 

This index is now at a new all-time low for its 24-year history. 

Mortgage rates have been dropping and are now, on average, 70bps lower in August than in May, but this has not yet reached levels sufficient to support mortgage demand. 

Unlike in Australia, mortgage rates can be fixed at the outset for the full term in the US. As a result, the differential between existing mortgages and market rates makes it too expensive for many homeowners to move, which should continue to weigh on the supply of homes for sale.   

Upcoming Fed meeting

The next meeting is scheduled for 17-18 September. 

Over the past week, the market has moved to price in a 33bps cut in September (i.e. roughly halfway between a 25bp and a 50bp cut) and about 100bps of cuts by the end of the year.  

We would likely need to see an unemployment rate at 4.3% in this Friday’s labour data to support a 50bp cut. This remains to be seen, though weekly claims data is supportive of an unemployment rate below 4.3%, with the four-week average claims running at 232k. 

Soft landing data After strong 3% growth in GDP for Q224, of which two-thirds was driven by consumption, the Atlanta Fed GDPNow Tracker is looking for a robust 2.5% in Q324. This has ticked up following strong consumption data. 

Australia policy and macro

Australia’s July Consumer Price Index (CPI) fell from 3.8% YoY in June to 3.5% YoY in July.

This was 10bps higher than expected, but the timing of an electricity subsidy accounted for the difference.

The trimmed mean CPI slowed to 3.8% YoY from 4.1% YoY and is trending down broadly in line with the RBA’s most recent forecasts for Q324.

Retail sales were up 2.3% YoY in July but flat month-on-month and below consensus expectations of +0.3%.

This is somewhat surprising given the strong start to FY25, flagged by several consumer discretionary companies during reporting season.

One possible explanation is that the stronger players in each category – think Temple & Webster (TPW), Endeavour (EDV), Universal Stores (UNI) – are taking market share.  

As previously flagged, the Australian Boomer is continuing to boom. 

UBS estimates that the total retirement benefits paid out over FY24 rose to a record high of $160 billion, equivalent to roughly 11% of household income. 

This has been driven by record-high levels of retirement assets, which now total $3.9 trillion (about 147% of annual nominal GDP). 

Retailers that cater for an older demographic (e.g. Nick Scali (NCK)) have benefited in this environment. 

We also saw the latest capex data for Q2 2024.

It suggests that mining companies are becoming more cautious on the outlook for investment in the sector, with FY24 estimates downgraded and forward estimates tracking for a fall in FY25. 

That said, we have seen some companies buck this trend during reporting season, with both Fortescue (FMG) and Mineral Resources (MIN) guiding to increased capex spend. 

Find out about

Crispin Murray’s Pendal Focus Australian Share Fund

Eurozone inflation

The August print was in line with expectations, keeping the European Central Bank on track to cut by 25bps at the September meeting. 

Headline inflation is now running at 2.2%, while core inflation is running at 2.8%.

Services inflation (at 4.2%) remains stubbornly sticky and may have been assisted by one-off factors such as the Olympics. 

NVIDIA result and AI

NVIDIA yet again beat expectations and raised guidance in its quarterly results last week. 

Revenue grew 15% to US$30 billion for the quarter (versus consensus of 10% growth) and guided to US$32.5 billion for Q3 2025 (versus the market at US$31.5 billion). 

Data centre demand remains strong and broad-based across hyperscale, consumer internet and enterprise customers. 

The demand for sovereign AI has strengthened further, with low double-digit billions in sales forecast for FY25 (increased from high-single digits). This reflects sovereign states’ desire to build AI models that are based on local datasets, language and cultures. 

However, the disappointment was on gross profit margin guidance at 75% for 3Q 2024, which was 40bps below expectations and implied guidance for gross profit margins in the low-70s for Q4 2024. 

This reflects the introduction of the new Blackwell family of chips, which start at a higher cost before reaching scale during 2025. 

Revenue upgrades on a bullish outlook for data centre demand were mostly offset by cost upgrades, limited EPS upgrades to low-single digits. 

Valuation does not look unreasonable in our view, with NVDA trading roughly 15% below its five-year average multiple.

NVDA’s 154% YoY growth in data centre revenue is supportive for the local Australian-listed plays, like Goodman (GMG), NextDC (NXT), Macquarie Telecom (MAQ) and Infratil (IFT), of which the first three are held across a variety of Pendal’s Australian equities portfolios.

Find out about

Pendal Smaller
Companies Fund

Australian markets

The final week of reporting season was a good one, though the S&P/ASX Small Ordinaries was a touch softer (down 0.19%). 

Financials (up 2.21%) and REITs (up 2.20%) were the best-performing sectors, while Technology (down 1.65%) and Consumer Discretionary (down 1.30%) were the weakest.  

A few industry-level observations emerged from reporting season, including:

  • Bank net-interest-margins (NIMs) surprised on the upside and domestic general insurance trends have strengthened.
  • The contractors and services companies have been getting it done – those already in good shape (e.g. Seven Group (SVW) and Ventia (VNT)) have excelled in an easier labour environment, while the tough operating environment in recent years has helped whip the rest of the sector into much better shape (e.g. Downer (DOW) and Worley (WOR)). 
  • Consumer discretionary has been a mixed bag, but the highest-quality operators have continued to take share and grow in a challenging retail environment (e.g. Breville Group (BRG), Temple & Webster (TPW), JB Hi-Fi (JBH), Universal Stores (UNI), Super Retail (SUL)).
  • Travel has been more challenged and FY25 is likely to be more volatile, particularly for the travel agents and those exposed to hotel bookings (e.g. Flight Centre (FLT), Webjet (WEB), Corporate Travel Management (CTD) and Siteminder (SDR)). On the other hand, Qantas (QAN), continues to trade well.

Our property team of Peter Davison and Julia Forrest note the following regarding the REIT space:

  • REITs have broadly seen better rent growth (up 4.1%), with malls particularly strong (up 5.8%) and office still the weakest sub-sector (up 2%). 
  • Nearly every REIT is highlighting far better credit conditions, longer tenor and lower margins.
  • Debt costs, as measured by the three-year swap rate, have fallen by almost 60-80bps in the past two months – boding well for leveraged names and property fund managers.
  • Regional malls are all trading well, with positive leasing spreads, low occupancy and very good demand for regional mall space. Importantly, buying interest for larger property assets is now reaching larger-scale mall assets. There has been very good demand for recent unlisted offerings by Scentre Group for its Tea Tree and Westlakes mall assets in Adelaide. This is a meaningful change in market dynamics.
  • Melbourne is the weakest residential market, while Brisbane, Perth and Adelaide are very strong. Retirement living (land-lease communities) is also very weak in Melbourne.
  • Apartment markets are all very weak on delivery concerns and affordability issues. Only luxury apartments are making money.
  • Industrial assets are still recording high rent growth (about 4.6%).
  • Office is still the weakest sector, with 2% rent growth.

About Elise McKay and Pendal Australian share funds

Elise is an investment analyst and portfolio manager with Pendal’s Australian equities team. Elise previously worked as an investment analyst for US fund manager Cartica where she covered a variety of emerging market companies.

She has also worked in investment banking and corporate finance at JP Morgan and Ernst & Young.

Pendal Horizon Sustainable Australian Share Fund is a concentrated portfolio aligned with the transition to a more sustainable, future economy.

Pendal Focus Australian Share Fund is a high-conviction equity fund with a 16-year track record of strong performance in a range of market conditions. The Fund is rated at the highest level by Lonsec, Morningstar and Zenith.

Pendal is an independent, global investment management business focused on delivering superior investment returns for our clients through active management. 

Contact a Pendal key account manager here

We have updated and reissued the Product Disclosure Statements (PDSs) for the following funds effective on and from Monday, 2 September 2024. 

  • Barrow Hanley Concentrated Global Share Fund
  • Barrow Hanley Concentrated Global Share Fund No. 2
  • Barrow Hanley Concentrated Global Share Fund No. 3

(each a Fund, together the Funds).

The following is a summary of the key changes reflected in the PDS for each Fund.

Updates to significant risks disclosure

Each Fund’s investment strategy involves specific risks.

We have updated the significant risks disclosure applicable to each Fund to ensure that our disclosure continues to align with the nature and risk profile of each Fund and the current economic and operating environment.

Updates to ongoing annual fees and costs disclosure

The estimated ongoing annual fees and costs for each Fund have been updated to reflect financial year 2024 fees and costs. These include changes to estimated management costs and estimated transaction costs.

We now also disclose the maximum management fee we are entitled to charge under each Fund’s constitution.

Updates to restrictions on withdrawals

We have updated the disclosure on restrictions on withdrawal to align closer to what is in each Fund’s constitution.

Updates to our complaints handling process

We have provided additional details about our complaints handling process and the Australian Financial Complaints Authority.

We have updated and reissued the Product Disclosure Statements (PDSs) for the following classes of units in the Regnan Global Equity Impact Solutions Fund (the Fund), effective on and from Monday, 2 September 2024: 

  • Regnan Global Equity Impact Solutions Fund – Class R
  • Regnan Global Equity Impact Solutions Fund – Class W

The following is a summary of the key changes to the PDSs.

Labour, Environmental, Social, Governance and Ethical (ESG) disclosure

We have enhanced our ESG disclosure to describe the Fund’s impact objective and the eight impact themes targeted by the Fund.

We have also provided clarification that the Fund may hold cash and may use derivatives from time to time and that exclusionary screens are not applied to the Fund’s investments in cash or derivatives. The use of derivatives may result in the Fund having indirect exposure to the excluded companies.

There has been no change to the Fund’s investment approach, or the exclusionary screens employed by the Fund.

Updates to significant risks disclosure

The Fund’s investment strategy involves specific risks.

We have updated the significant risks disclosure applicable to the Fund to ensure that our disclosure continues to align with the nature and risk profile of the Fund and the current economic and operating environment.

Updates to ongoing annual fees and costs disclosure

The estimated ongoing annual fees and costs for the Fund has been updated to reflect financial year 2024 fees and costs. These include changes to estimated management costs and estimated transaction costs.

We now also disclose the maximum management fee we are entitled to charge under the Fund’s constitution.

Updates to restrictions on withdrawals

We have updated the disclosure on restrictions on withdrawal to align closer to what is in each Fund’s constitution.

Additional information on how to apply for direct retail investors

We have provided additional information for non-advised retail investors (retail investors without a financial adviser) investing directly in Class R units of the Fund who may also be required to complete a series of questions as part of their online Application, to assist us in understanding whether they are likely to be within the target market for a Fund.

Updates to our complaints handling process

We have provided additional details about our complaints handling process and the Australian Financial Complaints Authority.

We have updated and reissued the Product Disclosure Statements (PDSs) for the following classes of units in the Barrow Hanley Concentrated Global Share Fund Hedged (the Fund), effective on and from Monday, 2 September 2024: 

  • Barrow Hanley Concentrated Global Share Fund Hedged – Class R
  • Barrow Hanley Concentrated Global Share Fund Hedged – Class Z

The following is a summary of the key changes to the PDSs.

Updates to significant risks disclosure

The Fund’s investment strategy involves specific risks.

We have updated the significant risks disclosure applicable to the Fund to ensure that our disclosure continues to align with the nature and risk profile of the Fund and the current economic and operating environment.

Updates to ongoing annual fees and costs disclosure

The estimated ongoing annual fees and costs for the Fund has been updated to reflect financial year 2024 fees and costs. These include changes to estimated management costs and estimated transaction costs.

We now also disclose the maximum management fee we are entitled to charge under the Fund’s Constitution.

Updates to restrictions on withdrawals

We have updated the disclosure on restrictions on withdrawal to align closer to what is in each Fund’s constitution.

Updates to our complaints handling process

We have provided additional details about our complaints handling process and the Australian Financial Complaints Authority.

Here are the main factors driving the ASX this week, according to Pendal’s head of equities CRISPIN MURRAY. Reported by portfolio specialist Chris Adams

MARKETS continued trailing back toward their July highs last week, driven by commentary from Federal Reserve Chairman Jay Powell.

Powell expressed confidence that a soft landing is achievable and said that the Fed would focus on keeping the labour market strong as it makes progress towards its inflation target.

The “Fed put” is back in terms of monetary policy, providing important insurance against recession risk.

US bonds rallied and the market is now pricing in a roughly 50% chance of a 50 basis point (bp) rate cut in September.

The US Dollar weakened, which is supportive for risk assets, and crypto rallied, indicating that liquidity is coming back to markets.

The S&P 500 gained 1.47%, while the S&P/ASX 300 finished up 0.90%.

The main check on equities is the fear of September, which is seasonally the weakest month.

Local earnings results remain supportive, albeit with some pockets of weakness which tend to reflect specific industry issues rather than broader economic malaise

Pendal Focus Australian Share Fund

Now rated at the highest level by Lonsec, Morningstar and Zenith

US economy: green light confirmed for a series of rate cuts

Two years ago, Powell used his Jackson Hole address to signal that the Fed would risk recession to restore price stability.

His speech at the same venue last week was as close as you get in central bank world to a declaration of victory.

The message was the labour market will not be a source of inflationary pressure. Instead, it is cooling – and the Fed does not want it to cool any further.

Powell noted that “the time has come for policy to adjust” and that “the direction of travel is clear, and the timing and pace of rate cuts will depend on incoming data, the evolving outlook and the balance of risks”.

There was no specific lead on whether we see a 25bp or 50bp cut in September; this depends on employment data.

However, the key point is that we will see a series of cuts into next year.

This is supportive for equities as it reduces the tail risk of a recession. Should the economy slow quicker than expected, it will still affect the market – but the downside is limited, as it would be mitigated by more accelerated easing.

The more material tail risk is a re-acceleration of inflation as the economy cools, but this looks unlikely for now.

US economy: slowing but no signs of recession

There were a number of data points supporting the notion of an economy which is slowing, but not sliding into recession.

  1. US payroll data saw its annual revisions and was adjusted down 818k for the year – this is much larger than normal and gives fuel to bearish arguments. It was expected, to some degree, given the gap between this data set and the Household Survey. The key observation is that the economy wasn’t as strong as previously thought and that cracks in the labour market started earlier. But this does not imply that the odds of recession have risen. We note this data is often revised again and the final estimate has been above the preliminary for the past five years.
  2. Jobless claims data remained benign again last week
  3. The Flash US composite Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) data was solid, falling to 54.1 versus 54.3 the previous month, but above the consensus of 53.2. Services rose to 55.2 from 55.0 and beat expectations of 54.0. Manufacturing was weaker at 48.0 versus 49.6 last month and the 49.5 expected. There was a drop in the employment component to 48.9 from 51.6, which highlights there are still risks to employment data.
  4. New home sales were stronger than expected, which could signal that the impact of lower mortgage rates is beginning to flow through. This may help clear the inventory issue holding back new home construction.

The Atlanta Fed GDP Now measure is still hanging in there at 2.0% for Q3. It has dropped from just under 3%, which relates to home construction, which may turn soon.

Europe

Stronger PMI data was put down to a combination of the Euros, Olympics and Taylor Swift.

Underlying growth remains soft, with Germany quite bleak.

The European Central Bank’s (ECB) indicator of negotiated wages fell materially from 4.74% to 3.55%. This should remove one of the barriers to future ECB rate cuts.

Markets

Last week’s weakness in the US Dollar was interesting.

The US Dollar Index (DXY) fell 1.7% – just breaking down through a technical resistance level – and is down 4.9% in the quarter to date.

This reflects the more benign US inflation outlook, allowing the Fed to move faster on rate cuts.

A falling US Dollar, combined with weaker oil and lower bond yields, is typically helpful for equities.

The other potential positive is that a weaker US Dollar may allow Chinese policy to be more stimulative. This remains the key concern for global growth and has weighed on commodity prices and resource stocks.

The oil price is resting on technical support levels. Iraq is making noise about breaking its quotas, so the Saudi reaction will be interesting.

Australia

The ASX continues to grind higher.

Resources didn’t drag last week – the main sector moves were driven by stock-specific factors relating to results, notably Wisetech Global driving tech and Brambles lifting industrials.

Thus far, the take-outs from reporting season are:

  • The market is looking for beta – any promise of upside is being enthusiastically embraced rather than being challenged, as seen in Wisetech last week and Pro Medicus the week before. 
  • Good industry structures and capital discipline are being rewarded (e.g. insurance).
  • Some signs of a turn in industrials which have been navigating a post-covid hangover (e.g. Brambles, Ansell and Reliance Worldwide)
  • Consumers are receptive to product innovation and good value propositions (eg Breville Group and Super Retail)
  • The steel industry is suffering as a result of China’s over-production and exports
  • Earnings volatility and rising capital intensity are being penalised by the market (eg A2 Milk and Ampol).

About Crispin Murray and the Pendal Focus Australian Share Fund

Crispin Murray is Pendal’s Head of Equities. He has more than 27 years of investment experience and leads one of the largest equities teams in Australia. Crispin’s Pendal Focus Australian Share Fund has beaten the benchmark in 12 years of its 16-year history (after fees), across a range of market conditions.

Pendal is a global investment management business focused on delivering superior investment returns for our clients through active management. 

Find out more about Pendal Focus Australian Share Fund  

Contact a Pendal key account manager

Why markets are consolidating | Modern investing myths | Opportunities in mid-caps and emerging markets

What can we learn from the latest RBA meeting minutes? Head of government bond strategies TIM HEXT offers readers a look inside the meeting of “two-handed” economists

IF anyone complains about RBA transparency, they are not paying attention.

The minutes from the central bank’s early August meeting were released today, though I am not sure minutes is the correct word – at 3,667 words, transcript might be a better term.

Together, with the post-meeting press conference, the RBA is putting its best foot forward in communicating with the public, as encouraged by the RBA review.

There was so much to say but so little confidence in anything.

Even the new Deputy Governor Andrew Hauser chose a recent speech to warn of false prophets and said we should have little confidence in any forecasts.

In the minutes we were treated to such gems as:

  • “It was not possible to either rule in or rule out future changes in the cash rate.”
  • “Members will rely on the data and evolving assessment of risks to guide the Boards decisions.”
  • “Members observed that a range of uncertainties could influence the outlook for inflation, including the evolution of the labour market, household saving behaviour and the extent of spare capacity, as well as global geopolitical developments.”

However, the one thing the RBA was keen to say is that if the Board was to do anything near term it is hiking – not cutting.

It believes there is less spare capacity in the economy than previously thought. If that does not improve, then inflation will be too slow to fall.

Very little spare capacity when GDP is barely growing?

Sounds like the Board still believes we have a supply problem. Otherwise, its message could be summarised as “we need a recession to beat inflation”, which is a variation of Paul Keating’s “recession we had to have”.

I am not sure it would want that headline.

We disagree with the RBA’s current concerns, finding more agreement with the ex-RBA chief economist – now Westpac Chief economist – Luci Ellis.

She describes the RBA as “skating to where the puck used to be” due to the fact that the RBA is focused on where the labour market was, not is.

Recent data showing increasing participation and supply, falling hours worked per person, and improving real incomes means the puck has moved.

In the months ahead, the RBA should be increasingly comfortable with labour market dynamics helping lower inflation. This should change its narrative and see it follow other central banks by cutting rates early next year.

Remember, the RBA stated in February 2022 that “while inflation has picked up, it is too early to conclude it is sustainably within the target range” and that “there are uncertainties about how persistent the pick-up in inflation will be as supply side problems are resolved”.

In May 2022, it hiked.

Outlook

Markets for now are largely ignoring the RBA anyway. Three-year bonds remain near 3.5% and ten-year bonds finally seem to be holding just below 4%.

At these levels, bond markets are no longer super cheap but, at the risk of becoming a two-handed fund manager, they are also not expensive. It is important to remember the cycle has turned and, when that happens, yields will trend lower for an extended period.


About Tim Hext and Pendal’s Income & Fixed Interest boutique

Tim Hext is a Pendal portfolio manager and head of government bond strategies in our Income and Fixed Interest team.

Tim has extensive experience in banking, financial markets and funding including senior positions with NSW Treasury Corporation (TCorp), Westpac Treasury, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Deutsche Bank, Bain & Co and Swiss Bank Corporation.

Pendal’s Income and Fixed Interest boutique is one of the most experienced and well-regarded fixed income teams in Australia.

Find out more about Pendal’s fixed interest strategies here


About Pendal

Pendal is a global investment management business focused on delivering superior investment returns for our clients through active management.

In 2023, Pendal became part of Perpetual Limited (ASX:PPT), bringing together two of Australia’s most respected active asset management brands to create a global leader in multi-boutique asset management with autonomous, world-class investment capabilities and a growing leadership position in ESG.

Contact a Pendal key account manager

Here are the main factors driving the ASX this week, according to Pendal’s head of equities CRISPIN MURRAY. Reported by portfolio specialist Chris Adams

A BOUNCE-BACK in equities accelerated last week as the market gained confidence that the US economy was not entering recession, liquidity remained supportive and the bulk of the Japanese yen carry-trade unwind had played out.

The S&P 500 rose 3.99%, breaking through technical resistance levels to get within 2% of the July high, while the S&P/ASX 300 gained 2.57% and is also within 2% of its highs.

Key US data points indicated the labour market was holding up. Retail sales and Walmart results pointed to a solid consumer and survey data suggested August may be stronger relative to July.

Since a back-track from the Bank of Japan, the yen has stabilised and the Topix has staged a strong recovery. This materially reduces the risk of a negative liquidity spiral.

The VIX (a measure of stock market volatility) has unwound its spike and is back to the levels of late July, which means the forced cutting of positions should have finished.

So, the gravest fears for a material market sell-off look to be over.

With negative seasonal effects and limited new positive news, we expect that the market can now consolidate. It has shown impressive resilience and that should help underpin returns into the year end.

All eyes are on Fed Chair Powell and his Jackson Hole speech this Friday.

In Australia the first major week for results was positive.

Banks, telecom and discretionary stocks are seeing upgrades and the broader read on the economy suggests things are holding up well.

US growth – recession risk reduced, the soft-landing narrative has resumed.

A series of data points, while not strong, highlight the economy is holding up and the payrolls panic is now dissipating.

  1. Survey data is supportive — Indicators such as the Evercore ISI Company Survey are ticking higher in August.
  2. Solid US retail sales growth Headline retail sales rose 1.0% month-on-month in July, helped by a weather-related bounce back in auto sales. But even the underlying ex-auto data was solid, growing +0.3% month-on-month and taking the three-month annualised rate back to 4.9%, the highest level since late 2023. The market was relieved there were no signs of renewed weakness and encouraged by the improvement in some of the discretionary sectors such as consumer electronics, hardware and auto. Survey data such as the Evercore ISI Retailers Sales Survey indicate August may be good, with firm back to school sales. Decelerating income growth remains the risk to consumption.
  3. Strong Walmart sales — Walmart, along with Amazon, is the proxy for US retail sales at ~10% of market. It reported 4.2% sales growth, which is ~150bps above the US average. This is driven by its E-com business, but also signals disinflation easing. General merchandise saw the first positive sales growth since Q4 2021. It is interesting to note that Walmart represents 15% of total US retail sales growth, while Costco (with 3% market share) is capturing 6% of total growth and Amazon is getting 45% of the growth.
  4. Initial jobless claims eased off — The market was focused on this as a read on non-farm payroll data, given the latter prompted recent volatility. A longer term look at continuing claims, which are correlated to job losses, also suggests we are not at recessionary levels.

We did see some weakness in housing starts and also in the homebuilder survey, despite the recent move lower in US mortgage rates.

This is an interest rate-sensitive sector and will motivate the Fed to cut rates.

Inflation gives them scope to do so:

  • July’s headline consumer price index (CPI) rose +0.2% month-on-month and is at 2.9% year-on-year. Core CPI is up +0.2% for the month and 3.2% for the year.
  • “Super-core” inflation is running below the 2% target on a three-month annualised basis.

This suggests inflation is not a barrier for rate cuts, that there is no need to hold rates in the 5% range, and that we should see 75-100bp of cuts by the end of the 2024.

On the political front, the RCP Betting Average data indicates that Kamala Harris is currently the clear favourite to win this year’s Presidential election. Her win probability is sitting at ~53% versus ~46% for Donald Trump.

We are beginning to see some indication of policy from Harris. The most relevant for our market was the potential for first time home buyer support for new homes, which would be positive for James Hardie.

Australia

We saw more strong employment data, with employment rising 58k month-on-month versus market expectations of about 10k. Full time employment rose 62k.

Both the three and six-month rise in employment is accelerating, which highlights that the economy is fine.

Hours worked also rose, up 0.4% month-on-month, although there were material reductions to prior months, which should help productivity measures look better.

Unemployment did rise, up 0.1% to 4.2%. This is due to labour participation rising to record levels of 67.1%.

The bottom line is the economy remains in good shape, and the consumer should hold up while the labour market remains as it is.

We also saw the RBA talking hawkishly about the outlook for inflation and clearly signalling rates won’t be cut until next year. The market is expecting the first cut in February.

Markets

The rally in markets has broken the technical downtrend and now looks likely to test the highs, but will probably consolidate in a trading band through to October, in our view.

Technical indicators such as the stock advance/decline ratio show some good strength, albeit now as positive as we saw at the market low in October last year.

The proportion of stocks above their 200-day moving averages also suggests the market is unlikely to break down.

Pendal Focus Australian Share Fund

Now rated at the highest level by Lonsec, Morningstar and Zenith

Bonds are hovering around the support levels of 3.80% (for US 10-year treasuries). We would probably need to see more weak data for them to go lower from here.

All this suggests we are back to the best of both worlds – inflation low enough to cut rates combined with a slowing economy that is avoiding recession.

ASX reporting season

Australia also had a strong week, benefiting from the broader global market bounce and a good start to reporting season.

The first big week of results season was a clear positive for the market:

  • Large index stocks are all doing well. Commonwealth Bank saw positive earnings revisions on better margins and lower bad debts. Telstra also saw positive revisions. CSL was revised down 4%, but this was seen more as them being conservative.
  • Stocks exposed to the domestic economy all point to solid back drop. JB Hi-Fi said June and July retail sales were good. Seven Group, a bellwether for industrial demand, was positive on the outlook.
  • Popular growth names like Pro Medicus and Car Group were comfortable with their outlooks
  • Any negative surprises tended to be limited and generally stock specific. Cochlear and Origin Energy had cost issues, while Seek’s challenges relate to job advertisement volumes, which are more tied to labour turnover than job losses.

M&A activity is providing additional support. Orora received a takeover approach while Sims sold off a business at a good price.

It is worth highlighting the substantial sector rotation between banks and resources.

Another ~7% relative move last week takes calendar year-to-date outperformance of banks versus resources to more than 30%, which is a material move in a historical context.

This reflects domestic economic resilience and better margins, while China remains weak with an uncertain outlook.

Iron ore weakness is weighing on Resources. China’s largest steel maker, Baowu, warned China’s steel industry is facing a crisis more serious than the downturns of 2008 and 2015.

This prompted both Tangshan and Yunan provinces to announce steel production cuts in an attempt to improve margins.

We also continued to see weakness in lithium with a poor auction for material in China leading to talk of stock having to be dumped on the market.

We are approaching levels where we may see supply adjustment.


About Crispin Murray and the Pendal Focus Australian Share Fund

Crispin Murray is Pendal’s Head of Equities. He has more than 27 years of investment experience and leads one of the largest equities teams in Australia.

Pendal is a global investment management business focused on delivering superior investment returns for our clients through active management. 

Find out more about Pendal Focus Australian Share Fund  

Contact a Pendal key account manager

The past few years have played havoc with market assumptions. Here, Pendal’s AMY XIE PATRICK explains what’s really going on with inverted yield curves and other misunderstood investing concepts

THE past few years have played havoc with conventional market assumptions.

Inverted yield curves don’t mean recessions are imminent. Expensive valuations can get more expensive. An aggressive hiking cycle need not bring about recession. Bonds don’t have to go up when equities go down.

These kind of outcomes cause head-scratching among modern-day market participants.

But viewed through a longer-term lens (think multiple cycles and regimes) it becomes clearer.

Let’s have a look at each of these broken relationships.

Are yield curves a recession predictor?

An inverted yield curve happens when short-term interest rates are higher than long-term ones — an unusual occurrence traditionally viewed as a sign of economic slow-down or looming recession.

In my view, inverted yield curves don’t signal imminent recession.

Yes, every US recession has been preceded by an inverted yield curve.

But if you look back through enough history, you’ll discover that the lag between the moment of curve inversion and when a recession eventually hits is highly variable (three months to two years).

As far as recession indicators go, the inverted yield curve is about as useful as a wet paper bag.

So, what does an inverted yield curve tell us? Simply that the market expects interest rate cuts at some point down the line, and that current policy settings are restrictive and will be normalised (for whatever reason) in the future.

Two things cause policy settings to normalise from restrictive territory: either growth slows, or inflation cools. It can also be both, but disinflation is possible without slower growth. 2023 was evidence of that.

Valuations are not a trading tool

Valuations should provide investors with information on risk-reward dynamics, but they have never been a good timing tool for investment decisions.

With the hype of generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) building over the past year has come plenty of scepticism over where that now puts overall equity valuations. That scepticism is probably what makes expensive tech stocks more expensive when markets are benign.

It takes a reality that falls short of expectations to make those stocks cheaper. Maybe even then, they won’t be outright cheap.

Hikes weren’t the only thing that happened

The rate hikes of 2022 and 2023 were supposed to cause a recession.

What we didn’t expect was a break from fiscal prudence and outright austerity.

The market lacked muscle memory for how to incorporate the pandemic fiscal response. Nowhere was it larger or more enduring than the United States.

The result of this stimulus, which happened in multiple forms over most of the world, was to put cash into people’s pockets.

That liquid spending power mutes the effect of interest rate hikes. Who cares if the cost of borrowing is soaring when there’s all this cash in my pocket?

That doesn’t mean those rate hikes will never matter. The effects will reveal themselves when the cash runs out.

Ironically, for the next economic cycle to begin, this current cycle needs to find a landing.

Soft or hard landing probably doesn’t matter too much – either way, interest rates will come down and borrowing can then become affordable to fuel the next wave of spending.

Bonds reveal their true colours

In the two decades after the Global Financial Crisis — and indeed because of the GFC — central banks extended a “put” to equity markets. If things got bad enough, they would cut interest rates.

Since bond yields and policy rates are inextricably linked, lower yields would lead to a boost in bond prices.

The negative correlation between bonds and equities during this period somehow made its way into tautology.

We are taught in Finance 101 that bonds are a “defensive” asset class, but what we ignored was that the only thing that afforded the “central bank put” was the absence of any real inflation impulse.

Bonds have never been a servant asset class to equities.

The same fundamentals that matter to bonds have always mattered: where inflation goes, where growth goes, and where central banks will take interest rates. That’s why bonds always rally at the start of recessions.

Whether central banks are late or right, a rapid cutting cycle will accompany any recession. The irony is that most recessions are baked in before the first rate cut.

What caused so much grief in 2022 was that higher inflation was a bigger problem than growth. Bonds did their job: yields rose and prices fell in anticipation of higher policy rates.

Since a high-inflation problem is a problem for all asset classes, bonds couldn’t help when equities derated. This time, the inflation backdrop meant that the central bank put was unaffordable.

Supportive part of the cycle for bonds

Bonds respond to the economic cycle.

As an asset class price returns tend to be mean reverting, with the forty-year bond bull run being an anomaly rather than the norm.

What matters more for bonds now isn’t whether the US fiscal situation is out of control, or whether Asian central banks have stopped buying US bonds. Political noise injects volatility bond markets, but their course will be set by the forces of the cycle.

For the next 12 months, what matters is inflation and growth, and on both fronts there’s reason to believe that bonds will be quite useful.

The path of disinflation has been bumpy and slow, but most major economy inflation data are coming within sight of central bank targets. This alone removes the need to fear more hikes and opens the door for easing.

Growth is also softening. No aspect of growth or demand is falling off a cliff, but it’s telling that oil has not been able to rally despite two unfortunate wars taking place in oil-heavy regions.

Europe has been teetering on the edge of recession for almost two years. China is going through its own version of the GFC aftermath. The bright spots have been where most fiscal ammunition was deployed during the pandemic.

The news here is that excess cash from pandemic-related fiscal stimulus is running out. A high US deficit alone won’t replenish that cash – that requires an ever-increasing higher deficit. That positive fiscal impulse is absent from current events.

The not-so-new news is that even if rate cuts were to start immediately, they are unlikely to offset the rise of average borrowing costs as older fixed-rate loans reset. This is especially true in the US.

Effects like these contribute to those long and variable lags of monetary policy.

What’s good for bond won’t always be good for equities

Given the positive correlation between bonds and equities, the market now thinks what’s good for bonds is also good for equities.

That’s true, but only up to a point.

As mentioned, lower inflation and growth are both good for bonds, but only the first of those things is good for equities.

When looking at risk premia across equities, credit and global market volatility, we can see that a soft landing is what’s priced in.

Earnings growth expectations over the next 12 months look very healthy. Trump tax cuts have already been baked into market prices even though polls have seen his chances of winning slide from 70% to now below 50% since Kamala Harris entered the race.

Exuberant sentiment can never in itself cause a market to turn, just like how valuations are poor timing tools. However, when risky assets are priced for very little downside this means that in the event of a negative catalyst, the downside becomes asymmetrically larger than any upside that can be gained from here.

At the start of every cycle’s softening trend, it’s impossible to discern whether the softening will accelerate – resulting in a hard landing.

The early part of the softening is good for bonds and equities, especially as the world comes off a high inflation problem. The risk is increasing that lower inflation will be engulfed by much lower growth.

Owning bonds at this stage of the cycle makes a lot of sense.

They will pay you a positive income and could deliver capital appreciation if inflation continues to come off – especially if that is accompanied by a worsening growth outlook.

The risk is another inflation shock, but there is sufficient consistency in lower prices and wages to argue for removing higher policy rates for the rest of this cycle.

Not owning equities can feel painful when the tech and AI driven story keeps gaining new legs.

So, owning bonds against this FOMO (fear of missing out) is a no-brainer – not because bonds are there to save us when equities fall, but because the growth speed bump that causes equities to fall is exactly the economic fundamental that will be a boon for bonds.


About Amy Xie Patrick and Pendal’s Income and Fixed Interest team

Amy is Pendal’s Head of Income Strategies. She has extensive expertise and experience in emerging markets, global high yield and investment grade credit and holds an honours degree in economics from Cambridge University.

Pendal’s Income and Fixed Interest boutique is one of the most experienced and well-regarded fixed income teams in Australia. The team oversees some $20 billion invested across income, composite, pure alpha, global and Australian government strategies.

Find out more about Pendal’s fixed interest strategies here

About Pendal Group

Pendal is a global investment management business focused on delivering superior investment returns for our clients through active management.

Contact a Pendal key account manager here